node package manager



Build Stats

Wicket is a lightweight library for translating between Well-Known Text (WKT) and various client-side mapping frameworks:

  • Leaflet (demo)
  • Google Maps API* (demo)
  • ESRI ArcGIS JavaScript API (demo)
  • Potentially any other web mapping framework through serialization and de-serialization of GeoJSON (with JSON.parse)

The core Wicket library and the Leaflet extension are both compatible with Node.js; the Google Maps and ArcGIS API extensions will not work in Node.js because they require a browser.

If you are looking for Apache Wicket, the web-app development framework for Java, you'll find it here.

*The Google Maps API extension can read WKT strings for (Multi)Polygons with interior rings/ holes but it cannot determine Multi-status or the nature of interior rings for google.maps.Polygon instances due to an outstanding bug.


Wicket is released under the GNU General Public License version 3 (GPLv3). Accordingly:

This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.


The following examples work in any of the mapping environments, as Wicket has a uniform API regardless of the client-side mapping library you're using.

// Create a new Wicket instance 
var wkt = new Wkt.Wkt();
// Read in any kind of WKT string"POLYGON ((30 10, 10 20, 20 40, 40 40, 30 10))");
// Or a GeoJSON string'{"coordinates": [[[30, 10], [10, 20], [20, 40], [40, 40], [30, 10]]], "type": "Polygon"}');
// Access and modify the underlying geometry 
// "[ [ {x: 30, y: 10}, {x: 10, y: 30}, ...] ]" 
wkt.components[0][1].x = 15;
wkt.merge(new Wkt.Wkt('POLYGON((35 15,15 25,25 45,45 45,35 15))'));
// MULTIPOLYGON(((30 10,10 20,20 40,40 40,30 10)),((35 15,15 25,25 45,45 45,35 15))) 
// Create a geometry object, ready to be mapped! 

Wicket will read from the geometry objects of any mapping client it understands. Note: Don't use the deconstruct() method! This is used internally by Wkt.Wkt() instances. Use fromObject() instead, as in the following example.

var wkt = new Wkt.Wkt();
// Deconstruct an existing point feature e.g. google.maps.Marker instance 
// "[ {x: 10, y: 30} ]" 
// Serialize a WKT string from that geometry 
// "POINT(10 30)" 

See Also

Dependencies and Build Information

Wicket has zero dependencies, however, JSON parsing (from strings) is not provided. Wicket looks for the function JSON.parse, which is provided in most modern browsers (get it with this library, if you need to support older browsers).

Minified versions can be generated via:

npm run build


npm test

The Google Maps API extension cannot be tested by Node.js at the command line; it requires a browser. The Google Maps API tests are run by Jasmine; navigate to the file tests/wicket-gmap3.html in a web browser.


Read the documentation here. Documentation can be generated with JSDoc 3.

git clone git://
./jsdoc /var/www/static/wicket/wicket.src.js

Or, with Node installed:

sudo npm install -g git://
jsdoc /var/www/static/wicket/wicket.src.js

Either way, make sure you invoke jsdoc from a directory in which you have write access; it will output documentation to your current working directory.



Wicket was created out of the need for a lightweight Javascript library that can translate Well-Known Text (WKT) strings into geographic features. This problem arose in the context of OpenClimateGIS, a web framework for accessing and subsetting online climate data.

OpenClimateGIS emits WKT representations of user-defined geometry. The API Explorer allowed users to define arbitrary areas-of-interest (AOIs) and view predefined AOIs on a Google Maps API instance. So, initially, the problem was converting between WKT strings and Google Maps API features. While other mapping libraries, such as OpenLayers, have very nice WKT libraries built-in, the Google Maps API, as of this writing, does not. In the (apparent) absence of a lightweight, easy-to-use WKT library in Javascript, I set out to create one.

That is what Wicket aspires to be: lightweight, framework-agnostic, and useful. I hope it achieves these goals. If you find it isn't living up to that and you have ideas on how to improve it, please fork the code or drop me a line.


Wicket borrows heavily from the experiences of others who came before us:


The base library, wicket.js, contains the Wkt.Wkt base object. This object doesn't do anything on its own except read in WKT strings, allow the underlying geometry to be manipulated programmatically, and write WKT strings. By loading additional libraries, such as wicket-gmap3.js, users can transform between between WKT and the features of a given framework (e.g. google.maps.Polygon instances). The intent is to add support for new frameworks as additional Javascript files that alter the Wkt.Wkt prototype.

To extend Wicket, nominally by writing bindings for a new mapping library, add a new file with a name like wicket-libname.src.js (and corresponding minified version wicket-libname.js) where "libname" is some reasonably short, well-known name for the mapping library.


WKT geometries are stored internally using the following convention. The atomic unit of geometry is the coordinate pair (e.g. latitude and longitude) which is represented by an Object with x and y properties. An Array with a single coordinate pair represents a a single point (i.e. POINT feature):

[ {x: -83.123, y: 42.123} ]
// POINT(-83.123 42.123) 

An Array of multiple points (an Array of Arrays) specifies a "collection" of points (i.e. a MULTIPOINT feature):

    [ {x: -83.123, y: 42.123} ],
    [ {x: -83.234, y: 42.234} ]
// MULTIPOINT(-83.123 42.123,-83.234 42.234) 

An Array of multiple coordinates specifies a collection of connected points in an ordered sequence (i.e. LINESTRING feature):

    {x: -83.12, y: 42.12},
    {x: -83.23, y: 42.23},
    {x: -83.34, y: 42.34}
// LINESTRING(-83.12 42.12,-83.23 42.23,-83.34 42.34) 

An Array can also contain other Arrays. In these cases, the contained Array(s) can each represent one of two geometry types. The contained Array might reprsent a single polygon (i.e. POLYGON feature):

        {x: -83, y: 42},
        {x: -83, y: 43},
        {x: -82, y: 43},
        {x: -82, y: 42},
        {x: -83, y: 42}
// POLYGON(-83 42,-83 43,-82 43,-82 42,-83 42) 

The above example cannot represent a LINESTRING feature (one of the few type-based constraints on the internal representations), however it may represent a MULTILINESTRING feature. Both POLYGON and MULTILINESTRING features are internally represented the same way. The difference between the two is specified elsewhere (in the Wkt instance's type) and must be retained. In this particular example (above), we can see that the first coordinate in the Array is repeated at the end, meaning that the geometry is closed. We can therefore infer it represents a POLYGON and not a MULTILINESTRING even before we plot it. Wicket retains the type of the feature and will always remember which it is.

Similarly, multiple nested Arrays might reprsent a MULTIPOLYGON feature:

            {x: -83, y: 42},
            {x: -83, y: 43},
            {x: -82, y: 43},
            {x: -82, y: 42},
            {x: -83, y: 42}
            {x: -70, y: 40},
            {x: -70, y: 41},
            {x: -69, y: 41},
            {x: -69, y: 40},
            {x: -70, y: 40}
// MULTIPOLYGON(((-83 42,-83 43,-82 43,-82 42,-83 42),(-70 40,-70 41,-69 41,-69 40,-70 40))) 

Or a POLYGON with inner rings (holes) in it where the outer ring is the polygon envelope and comes first; subsequent Arrays are inner rings (holes):

        {x: 35, y: 10},
        {x: 10, y: 20},
        {x: 15, y: 40},
        {x: 45, y: 45},
        {x: 35, y: 10}
        {x: 20, y: 30},
        {x: 35, y: 35},
        {x: 30, y: 20},
        {x: 20, y: 30}
// POLYGON((35 10,10 20,15 40,45 45,35 10),(20 30,35 35,30 20,20 30)) 

Or they might represent a MULTILINESTRING where each nested Array is a different LINESTRING in the collection. Again, Wicket remembers the correct type of feature even though the internal representation is ambiguous.