A Node.js implementation of RFC6265 for cookie parsing, storage, and retrieval.
Install Tough Cookie using npm
:
npm install tough-cookie
or yarn
:
yarn add tough-cookie
import { Cookie, CookieJar } from 'tough-cookie'
// parse a `Cookie` request header
const reqCookies = 'ID=298zf09hf012fh2; csrf=u32t4o3tb3gg43; _gat=1'.split(';').map(Cookie.parse)
// generate a `Cookie` request header
const cookieHeader = reqCookies.map(cookie => cookie.cookieString()).join(';')
// parse a Set-Cookie response header
const resCookie = Cookie.parse('foo=bar; Domain=example.com; Path=/; Expires=Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT')
// generate a Set-Cookie response header
const setCookieHeader = cookie.toString()
// store and retrieve cookies
const cookieJar = new CookieJar() // uses the in-memory store by default
await cookieJar.setCookie(resCookie, 'https://example.com/')
const matchingCookies = await cookieJar.getCookies('https://example.com/')
[!IMPORTANT] For more detailed usage information, refer to the API docs.
Support for RFC6265bis is being developed. As these revisions to RFC6252 are
still in Active Internet-Draft
state, the areas of support that follow are subject to change.
This change makes it possible for servers, and supporting clients, to mitigate certain types of CSRF
attacks by disallowing SameSite
cookies from being sent cross-origin.
import { CookieJar } from 'tough-cookie'
const cookieJar = new CookieJar() // uses the in-memory store by default
// storing cookies with various SameSite attributes
await cookieJar.setCookie('strict=authorized; SameSite=strict', 'http://example.com/index.html')
await cookieJar.setCookie('lax=okay; SameSite=lax', 'http://example.com/index.html')
await cookieJar.setCookie('normal=whatever', 'http://example.com/index.html')
// retrieving cookies using a SameSite context
const laxCookies = await cookieJar.getCookies('http://example.com/index.html', {
// the first cookie (strict=authorized) will not be returned if the context is 'lax'
// but the other two cookies will be returned
sameSiteContext: 'lax',
})
[!NOTE] It is highly recommended that you read RFC6265bis - Section 8.8 for more details on SameSite cookies, security considerations, and defense in depth.
Cookie prefixes are a way to indicate that a given cookie was set with a set of attributes simply by inspecting the first few characters of the cookie's name.
Two prefixes are defined:
-
"__Secure-"
If a cookie's name begins with a case-sensitive match for the string
__Secure-
, then the cookie was set with a "Secure" attribute. -
"__Host-"
If a cookie's name begins with a case-sensitive match for the string
__Host-
, then the cookie was set with a "Secure" attribute, a "Path" attribute with a value of "/", and no "Domain" attribute.
If prefixSecurity
is enabled for CookieJar
, then cookies that match the prefixes defined above but do
not obey the attribute restrictions are not added.
You can define this functionality by passing in the prefixSecurity
option to CookieJar
. It can be one of 3 values:
-
silent
: (default) Enable cookie prefix checking but silently fail to add the cookie if conditions are not met. -
strict
: Enable cookie prefix checking and error out if conditions are not met. -
unsafe-disabled
: Disable cookie prefix checking.
If
ignoreError
is passed in astrue
when setting a cookie then the error is silent regardless of theprefixSecurity
option (assuming it's enabled).
import { CookieJar, MemoryCookieStore } from 'tough-cookie'
const cookieJar = new CookieJar(new MemoryCookieStore(), {
prefixSecurity: 'silent'
})
// this cookie will be silently ignored since the url is insecure (http)
await cookieJar.setCookie(
'__Secure-SID=12345; Domain=example.com; Secure;',
'http://example.com',
)
// this cookie will be stored since the url is secure (https)
await cookieJar.setCookie(
'__Secure-SID=12345; Domain=example.com; Secure;',
'https://example.com',
)
[!NOTE] It is highly recommended that you read RFC6265bis - Section 4.1.3 for more details on Cookie Prefixes.
We follow the Node.js release schedule and support all versions that are in Active LTS or Maintenance. We will always do a major release when dropping support for older versions of node, and we will do so in consultation with our community.