git-publish
Publish your npm package to a Git branch.
Support this project by
Why?
To test a package without publishing to npm.
npm publish
to make a pre-release?
Why not use Because of the following drawbacks:
- Versioning concerns: even though you're just testing, you still need to version bump
- Undeleteable: releases are hard to remove due to npm's strict unpublish policy
- Unverifyable: npm does not offer a great way to browse the contents of a package
- Risky: Publishing tests to a production environment can be dangerous (eg. accidentally publish as stable)
npm link
?
What about - No npm life cycle scripts
- Includes non-publishable assets
- Doesn't install dependencies
git-publish
?
So why -
No versions: Instead of versions, branch names are used. Branches can be updated to reflect latest change.
-
Deletable: Simply delete the branch when you're done with it.
-
Browsable: Use GitHub to easily verify the contents of the branch. You can even share a link for others to see.
-
Dev environment: Low risk of mistakes.
-
Simulates
npm publish
: Runs npm life cycle scripts and only includes publishable assets.
Usage
Publish your npm package to a branch on the Git repository:
npx git-publish
This command will publish to the remote branch npm/<current branch>
.
Global install
Keep the command handy by installing it globally:
npm install -g git-publish
When globally installed, you can use it without npx
:
git-publish
Flags
Flag | Description |
---|---|
-b, --branch <branch name> |
The branch to publish the package to. Defaults to prefixing "npm/" to the current branch or tag name. |
-r, --remote <remote> |
The remote to push to. (default: origin ) |
-o, --fresh |
Publish without a commit history. Warning: Force-pushes to remote |
-d, --dry |
Dry run mode. Will not commit or push to the remote. |
-h, --help |
Show help |
--version |
Show version |
FAQ
What are some use-cases where this is useful?
-
When you want to test a new package that isn't ready to be published on npm.
-
When you're contributing to an open source project so you don't have publish access, but want to test the changes in a production-like environment.
-
When you want to test in a remote environment so you can't use
npm link
. -
When you want to avoid using
npm link
because of symlink complexities.
How can I include a build step?
Like npm publish
, you can call the build command it in the prepack
script.
What does this script do?
- Run npm hooks
prepare
&prepack
- Create a temporary branch by prefixing the current branch with the
npm/
namespace - Detect and commit only the npm publish files
- Push the branch to remote
- Delete local branch from Step 2
- Print the installation command for the branch
How is this different from simply committing the files to a branch?
-
There can be missing distribution files (eg. files outside of
dist
). git-publish uses npm-packlist —the same librarynpm publish
uses—to detect publish files declared viapackage.json#files
and.npmignore
. -
Irrelevant files are committed (eg. source files). This can slow down installation or even interfere with the library behavior. For example, if your project has development configuration files, they can accidentally be read by the dependent tooling.
-
npm hooks are not executed. git-publish simulates package packing and runs hooks
prepare
andprepack
.
Can I publish to and install from a private repository?
Yes, if using a Git client authorized to access the private repository.
If it must be publicly accessible, you can set the --remote <remote>
flag to push the publish assets to a public repository. It's recommended to compile and minify the code if doing this with private code.
User story
You want to test a branch on a private repository Repo A, but GitHub Actions on the consuming project Repo B doesn't have access to the private repository so npm install
fails.
To work around this, you can publish the branch to Repo B to install it from there:
$ npx git-publish --remote git@github.com:repo-b.git --branch test-pkg
✔ Successfully published branch! Install with command:
→ npm i 'repo-b#test-pkg'