Simple dependency injection container for Node, forked from di-namic. ECMAScript 6 only.
To facilitate better the design and testing of modules, by decoupling dependencies via the Inversion of Control principle.
Simply put: Don't instantiate dependencies in the module!
- Single 'container' where all dependencies are defined
- code-based as opposed to configuration-based
- each dependency has a scope:
- none OR
- singleton
- The container would generally be required by the top-level 'entry-point' .js file, which resolves dependencies from the container. As each of these has its own set of dependencies, a dependency graph is generated.
- Registration of dependencies to include the following types:
- objects with a constructor (ie: an instance should be created at resolution-time)
- static objects
- primitive types (ie: numbers, booleans, strings)
The following examples are of modules that have dependencies on other modules.
Prototype-based (not recommended (ES5 Classes); with promises)
module.exports = TestObj1;
function TestObj1(dependency1, dependency2) {
this.__dependency1 = dependency1;
this.__dependency2 = dependency2;
}
TestObj1.prototype.testMethod = function () {
const self = this;
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
self.__dependency1.testMethod()
.then(result1 => {
self.__dependency2.testMethod(result1)
.then(result2 => {
resolve(result2);
})
.catch(err => {
return reject(err);
});
})
.catch(err => {
reject(err);
});
});
};
OR
Class-based (recommended (ES6 Classes))
module.exports = class TestObj1 {
constructor(dependency1, dependency2) {
this.__dependency1 = dependency1;
this.__dependency2 = dependency2;
}
async testMethod() {
try {
const result1 = await this.__dependency1.testMethod();
return await this.__dependency2.testMethod(result1);
} catch (err) {
throw err;
}
}
};
The module is therefore not responsible for creating instances of a dependency, but is instead relying on a consumer to do the instantiation for us. From a testing perspective, this approach allows dependencies to be externally mocked.
Register a dependency. Each time resolve
is called, a new instance of the dependency is returned.
container.register(alias, dependency, ctorArgAliases)
Register a dependency. Each time resolve
is called, a new instance of the dependency is returned, using the dependency's own factory method.
container.registerFactory(alias, dependency, factoryMethodName)
Register a dependency. Each time resolve
is called, a singleton instance of the dependency is returned. The container maintains a single instance.
container.registerSingleton(alias, dependency)
Register a dependency. Each time resolve
is called, a singleton instance of the dependency is returned. The container maintains a single instance, which is originally created by the dependency's own factory method.
container.registerSingletonFactory(alias, dependency, factoryMethodName)
Returns an instance of a dependency.
container.resolve(alias)
-
alias:
- (string) key to refer to the registration
-
dependency:
- (object|instance|primitive) the dependency itself:
-
ctorArgAliases:
- the constructor arguments (i.e. dependencies), referred to by the aliases they've been registered with
-
factoryMethodName
- the factory method that creates an instance of the dependency
Using the framework requires an understanding of the principles of dependency injection, particularly constructor injection.
Javascript modules would typically rely on external dependencies introduced via the constructor function.
When using di-namic in a Node application:
- Dependencies are registered with the di-namic container
- The container must remain in scope for the lifetime of the application
- A "dependency tree" is created at the root/entry point of the application. For example this would be root index.js file of a typical Node application.
- There are 2 main functions on the container (see "container functions" above):
-
register
(with variations) resolve
-
The examples below are based on the module sample above.
TestObj1
↳ Dependency1
↳ Dependency2
index.js
const Container = require('di-namic').ContainerV2;
const Dependency1 = require('../lib/dependency1');
const Dependency2 = require('../lib/dependency2');
const TestObj1 = require('../lib/testObj1');
const app = require('../app');
module.exports = class Index {
constructor() {
this.__container = new Container();
}
//register the dependencies with the container
async register() {
await this.__container.register('Bob', Dependency1);
await this.__container.register('Mary', Dependency2);
// 'Joe' relies on 'Bob' and 'Mary'
await this.__container.register('Joe', TestObj1, ['Bob', 'Mary']);
}
async initialize() {
await this.register();
// resolve the dependency (including sub-dependencies)
var testObj1 = await this.__container.resolve('Joe');
// now start the app with dependencies injected into the constructor
await app.start(testObj1);
}
};
The above example is rather contrived - see the tests for a more comprehensive dependency tree example.
- https://martinfowler.com/bliki/InversionOfControl.html (old but still very relevant)
- https://martinfowler.com/articles/dipInTheWild.html
- http://www.devtrends.co.uk/blog/how-not-to-do-dependency-injection-the-static-or-singleton-container
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOLID
Please credit the author where appropriate. License below.
MIT License
Copyright (c) 2017
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.