react-immutable-proptypes
PropType validators that work with Immutable.js.
About
I got tired of seeing React.PropTypes.instanceOf(Immutable.List)
or React.PropTypes.instanceOf(Immutable.Map)
as PropTypes for components that should be specifying an Immutable.List
of something or that an Immutable.Map
contains some keys. A little "googling" came up empty, unless you want to use Flow, which I do not. So, I wrote react-immutable-proptypes
.
Usage is simple, they work with and like any React.PropType.*
validator.
var ImmutablePropTypes = ;var MyReactComponent = React;
Since version 0.1.7 there are convenience helpers for "primitive" Immutable.js objects.
propTypes: oldListTypeChecker: ReactPropTypes anotherWay: ImmutablePropTypeslist requiredList: ImmutablePropTypeslistisRequired mapsToo: ImmutablePropTypesmap evenIterable: ImmutablePropTypesiterable
Installation
Installing via npmjs
npm install --save react-immutable-proptypes
API
React-Immutable-PropTypes has:
- Primitive Types
ImmutablePropTypeslist // Immutable.List.isListImmutablePropTypesmap // Immutable.Map.isMapImmutablePropTypesorderedMap // Immutable.OrderedMap.isOrderedMapImmutablePropTypesset // Immutable.Set.isSetImmutablePropTypesorderedSet // Immutable.OrderedSet.isOrderedSetImmutablePropTypesstack // Immutable.Stack.isStackImmutablePropTypesseq // Immutable.Seq.isSeqImmutablePropTypesiterable // Immutable.Iterable.isIterableImmutablePropTypesrecord // instanceof RecordImmutablePropTypescontains // Immutable.Iterable.isIterable - contains(shape)ImmutablePropTypesmapContains // Immutable.Map.isMap - contains(shape)
ImmutablePropTypes.contains
(formerlyshape
) is based onReact.PropTypes.shape
and will try to work with anyImmutable.Iterable
. In my usage it is the most used validator, as I'm often trying to validate that a map has certain properties with certain values.
// ...aMap: ImmutablePropTypes.contains({ aList: ImmutablePropTypes.contains({ 0: React.PropTypes.number, 1: React.PropTypes.string, 2: React.PropTypes.number.isRequired, }).isRequired,})// ...<SomeComponent aList={Immutable.fromJS({aList: [1, 'two', 3]})} />
-
ImmutablePropTypes.listOf
is based onReact.PropTypes.array
and is specific toImmutable.List
. -
ImmutablePropTypes.mapOf
allows you to control both map values and keys (in Immutable.Map, keys could be anything including another Immutable collections). It accepts two arguments - first one for values, second one for keys (optional). If you are interested in validation of keys only, just passReact.PropTypes.any
as the first argument.
// ...aMap: ImmutablePropTypes.mapOf( React.PropTypes.any, // validation for values ImmutablePropTypes.mapContains({ // validation for keys a: React.PropTypes.number.isRequired, b: React.PropTypes.string }))// ...const aMap = Immutable.Map([ [Immutable.Map({a: 1, b: '2'}), 'foo'], [Immutable.Map({a: 3}), [1, '2', 3]]]);<SomeComponent aMap={aMap} />
-
ImmutablePropTypes.orderedMapOf
is basically the same asmapOf
, but it is specific toImmutable.OrderedMap
. -
ImmutablePropTypes.orderedSetOf
is basically the same aslistOf
, but it is specific toImmutable.OrderedSet
. -
ImmutablePropTypes.stackOf
is basically the same aslistOf
, but it is specific toImmutable.Stack
. -
ImmutablePropTypes.iterableOf
is the generic form of listOf/mapOf. It is useful when there is no need to validate anything other than Immutable.js compatible (ie.Immutable.Iterable
). Continue to uselistOf
and/ormapOf
when you know the type. -
ImmutablePropTypes.recordOf
is likecontains
, except it operates on Record properties.
// ...aRecord: ImmutablePropTypes// ...
ImmutablePropTypes.mapContains
is based onReact.PropTypes.shape
and will only work withImmutable.Map
.
// ...aMap: ImmutablePropTypes.mapContains({ aList: ImmutablePropTypes.list.isRequired,})// ...<SomeComponent aList={Immutable.fromJS({aList: [1, 2]})} />
These two validators cover the output of Immutable.fromJS
on standard JSON data sources.
RFC
Please send a message or, better yet, create an issue/pull request if you know a better solution, find bugs, or want a feature. For example, should listOf
work with Immutable.Seq
or Immutable.Range
. I can think of reasons it should, but it is not a use case I have at the present, so I'm less than inclined to implement it. Alternatively, we could add a validator for sequences and/or ranges.