domcon

'Domcon' allows significant DOM structures to be built from a fairly terse descriptive structure, and facilitates easy access to any elements.

Note that version 2 does not require jQuery, the dependency was removed as it was adding very little value, and some methods as well which were just pass throughs or had no clear use case. jQuery is used in the test suite for convenience however.

Quick start

Here's an example building a simple bootstrap form:

let form_dc = new domcon('form', {}, [
    ['div', {'class': 'form-group'}, [
        ['label', {}, 'Add friend:'],
        ['input', {'type': 'input', 'class': 'form-control'}],
        ['button', {'type': 'submit', 'class': 'btn btn-primary'}, 'OK'],
    ]],
]);

This obviously recursive structure is based around four field arrays, three of which are apparent above, the element name, an object of attributes, and the 'inner', which can be a text value or an array of child element specifications.

This will construct the following:

<form>
  <div class="form-group">
    <label>New label</label>
    <input type="input" class="form-control">
    <button type="submit" class="btn btn-primary">OK</button>
  </div>
</form>

The same construction can be achieved more tersely still with:

let nl_form_dc = new domcon(
    {'form': [
        {'div[class="form-group"]': [
            {'label': 'New label'},
            {'input[type="input",class="form-control"]': ''},
            {'button[type="submit",class="btn btn-primary"]': 'OK'},
        ]},
    ]}
);

This might look like only a marginal improvement, but some constructions are MUCH more terse, where the parser can make assumptions about your intent. See the constructor documentation for details.

The individual elements are made easily accessible, which is crucial if you construct a large lump of DOM but then need easy access to the various bits. So to access the input element for example:

let input_element = form_dc.div.input.e;

Because there can be multiple elements of the same name however, the following also works:

let input_element = form_dc.div.input[0].e;

If you build DOM elements as follows:

let form_dc = new domcon('form', {}, [
    ['div', {'class': 'form-group'}, [
        ['label', {}, 'Add friend:'],
        ['input', {'type': 'input', 'class': 'form-control'}],
        ['label', {}, 'Add enemy:'],
        ['input', {'type': 'input', 'class': 'form-control'}],
        ['button', {'type': 'submit', 'class': 'btn btn-primary'}, 'OK'],
    ]],
]);

The first and second input values can now be acquired like this:

let friend_input_element = form_dc.div.input[0].e;
let enemy_input_element = form_dc.div.input[1].e;

Note that though this numbered access method works if there is one or many elements with the given name, leaving out the number does not work if there are many, as this would be ambiguous and require arbitrary behaviour.

A way to avoid using the numeric indexing in this case is to supply an alternative unique ID name, using the fourth field in the element specification, like this:

let form_dc = new domcon('form', {}, [
    ['div', {'class': 'form-group'}, [
        ['label', {}, 'Add friend:'],
        ['input', {'type': 'input', 'class': 'form-control'}, [], 'friend'],
        ['label', {}, 'Add enemy:'],
        ['input', {'type': 'input', 'class': 'form-control'}, [], 'enemy'],
        ['button', {'type': 'submit', 'class': 'btn btn-primary'}, 'OK'],
    ]],
]);

Now the input values can now be acquired like this:

let friend_input_element = form_dc.div.friend.e;
let enemy_input_element = form_dc.div.enemy.e;

Or like this (the substitute ID doesn't actually have to be unique so it is possible for there to me more than one):

let friend_input_element = form_dc.div.friend[0].e;
let enemy_input_element = form_dc.div.enemy[0].e;

Contents

1. Quick start.
   1. Contents.
   2. Full API reference.
      1. Attributes.
         1. e.
      2. Functions.
         1. constructor.
         2. append_to.
         3. append.
         4. extend.

Full API reference

attributes

e

The e attribute is the DOM element. So for example if dc is your domcon object dc.e will be the DOM element it represents, or $(dc.e) the equivalent jQuery selection of it. A child element is no different so dc.form.input.e and $(dc.form.input.e) would be the input child(ren) element(s) of the form of the domcon object and the jQuery selection respectively.

The jQuery selection conversion will work transparently if there is a single or many children, and you can end up with a jQuery selection which has fairly arbitrary elements represented, because those are the ones you tagged with a particular alternative name.

functions

constructor

Constructs a domcon object, building the DOM elements described. There are two structural formats that may be used, the first is based around a recursive four element array format, for example:

let form_dc = new domcon('form', {}, [
    ['div', {'class': 'form-group'}, [
        ['label', {}, 'Add friend:'],
        ['input', {'type': 'input', 'class': 'form-control'}],
        ['label', {}, 'Add enemy:'],
        ['input', {'type': 'input', 'class': 'form-control'}, undefined, 'enemy'],
        ['button', {'type': 'submit', 'class': 'btn btn-primary'}, 'OK'],
    ]],
]);

The parameters are as follows:

1. The name of the element to build (required).
2. The attributes to apply to the element (optional, defaults to {}).
3. The child text or element specifications (optional, defaults to []).
4. An alternative navigation ID (optional, defaults to element name).

The 'child text or element specifications', if it isn't text, is an array of arrays, each sub array having up to four elements, which are used as parameters for recursive domcon construction of the child elements.

The above example will construct the following HTML therefore:

<form>
  <div class="form-group">
    <label>Add friend:</label>
    <input type="input" class="form-control">
    <label>Add enemy:</label>
    <input type="input" class="form-control">
    <button type="submit" class="btn btn-primary">OK</button>
  </div>
</form>

The elements created can be navigated by using the element names (or the alternative navigation ID if provided in parameter four. In the example above, the first input domcon object will be form_dc.div.input, and the second input domcon object will be form_dc.div.enemy, because the altnerative navigation ID enemy was used. Append .e to get the element represented by the domcon object.

If the second input had not been given an alternative navigation ID the two input domcon objects would have been form_dc.div.input[0] and form_dc.div.input[1] respectively.

The second more terse specification can make assumptions about your intent, based on DOM expectations, and this, along with some other adjustments to the format, can make it much more terse. First, the form above in this altnerative more terse format:

let form_dc = new domcon(
    {'form': [
        {'div[class="form-group"]': [
            {'label': 'Add friend:'},
            {'input[type="input",class="form-control"]': ''},
            {'label': 'Add enemy:'},
            {'input/enemy[type="input",class="form-control"]': ''},
            {'button[type="submit",class="btn btn-primary"]': 'OK'},
        ]},
    ]},
);

There is no assumption advantage here however, so, a better example is a table. Take the following:

let table_dc = new domcon(
    {'table': [
        {'thead': [
            {'tr': ['ID', 'Name', 'Position', 'Online']},
        ]},
        {'tbody': [
            {'tr/first[class="blue",id="top"]': ['1', 'Michael', 'Director', {'td[class="online"]': '4 min'}]},
            {'tr': ['2', 'John', 'Manager', {'td[class="online"]': '1 hour'}]},
            {'tr': ['3', 'Andrew', 'Janitor', {'td[class="offline"]': 'Offline'}]},
        ]},
    ]}
);

Here, a simple string is given for all the TR child elements constituting the table header, and the same for many of the TR child elements in the table body as well. The context (i.e. TR inside THEAD or TR inside TBODY allows the parser to decide if a TH or a TD should be created.

The HTML generated in this case is:

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>ID</th><th>Name</th><th>Position</th><th>Online</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr class="blue" id="top">
      <td>1</td><td>Michael</td><td>Director</td><td class="online">4 min</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>2</td><td>John</td><td>Manager</td><td class="online">1 hour</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>3</td><td>Andrew</td><td>Janitor</td><td class="offline">Offline</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

Using the original four element array structure would look like this (almost twice as much text):

let table_dc = new domcon('div', {}, [
    ['table', {}, [
        ['thead', {}, [
            ['tr', {}, [
                ['th', {}, 'ID'], ['th', {}, 'Name'], ['th', {}, 'Position'], ['th', {}, 'Online'],
            ] ],
        ]],
        ['tbody', {}, [
            ['tr', {'class' 'blue', 'id': 'top'}, [
                ['td', {}, '1'], ['td', {}, 'Michael'], ['td', {}, 'Director'], ['td', {class:'online'}, '4 min']
            ], 'first' ],
            ['tr', {}, [
                ['td', {}, '2'], ['td', {}, 'John'], ['td', {}, 'Manager'], ['td', {class:'online'}, '1 hour']
            ] ],
            ['tr', {}, [
                ['td', {}, '3'], ['td', {}, 'Andrew'], ['td', {}, 'Janitor'], ['td', {class:'offline'}, 'Offline']
            ] ],
        ]],
    ]]
]);

If domcon is called on to make an assumption but doesn't know the context, an error will be thrown with the message do not know what element to include for "STRING", where STRING is the content you have provided. In this case, you can either specify the name of the element by changing "STRING" into something like {'NAME': 'STRING'}, or add the missing assumption to the default_child function class (and submit a pull request for the change of course).

Finally, an array may be given as a single parameter to the constructor, and is taken to contain the four arguments (element name, attributes, child elements specification and alternative navigation name), as usual (though, also as usual, only the first is mandatory).

append_to

Appends the represented DOM element to the DOM element passed. For example:

dc.append_to(other_element);

This is the same as other_element.appendChild(dc.e).

Passing a domcon object also works.

append

Appends the DOM element passed to the represented DOM element. For example:

dc.append(other_element);

This is the same as dc.e.appendChild(other_element).

Passing a domcon object also works.

extend

Extends an existing domcon object with another child. This is useful in scenarios where some aspects of a DOM structure are initially created but then due to events or some other stimulus the DOM is added to. Clearly one perfectly valid solution is to use the DOM elements in the original structure and manipulate them directly, but this will not change the original domcon object, and if that is inconvenient, use this method.

Take the following for example:

let table_dc = new domcon({'table': [ ['tbody'] ]});

Adding rows to the table could later be done like this:

$(table_dc.e).append($('<tr><td>this</td><td>that</td></tr>'));

If it is useful to maintain the domcon object though, do this instead:

table_dc.tbody.extend({'tr': ['this', 'that']});

Navigation to the rows then works as normal, so table_dc.tbody.tr[n] will be the domcon object for any row added this way. If you sneek in a row without 'extending' the domcon object though, that row will always be invisible to it!