@codyduong/nav

Nav

A navigation utility for parsing API responses.

Written in TypeScript with strong inference engine. Handles all your data for you.

Install

npm	yarn
npm install @codyduong/nav	yarn add @codyduong/nav

import { nav } from '@codyduong/nav';

Usage

nav(root, tuplePath, default) 

• root - an Object to navigate through
• tuplePath - a tuple containing keys to navigate through the object with
• default - the default value to return if encountering an undefined/null value

Patterns

API Response

type foobarAPIReturn = Promise<{
  foo: 'bar';
  array: {
    name: `name_${string}`
    id: `ID_ABXDe_${string}`
  }[]
}>;
const foobar: foobarAPIReturn = await foobarAPI();
const results = nav(foobar, ['foo'] as const); //=> 'bar'
const foobarList = nav(foobar, ['array'] as const); //=> { name: `name_${string}`, id: `ID_ABXDe_${string}` }[]

Anti-Patterns

Highly recommended to always declare the object, path, and default with as const or explicitly type, this will prevent any short circuiting or narrowing logic done by TypeScript intepreter.

// ❌ This will work and type correctly sometimes, but will fail on larger and more complex objects, see below
nav({ foo: 'bar'}, ['foo']) //=> string

// ❌ If path is not asserted with `as const` it can fail on arrays since it short circuits to the path to (string | number)[]
const path = ['foo', 0, 'bar']
nav({ foo: [ { bar: true } ] }, ['foo', 0, 'bar']) // => { bar: boolean; }[] | { bar: boolean; }
nav({ foo: [ { bar: true } ] }, path) // <= Path! Argument of type '(string | number)[]' is not assignable to parameter of type...

// ✔️ Always assert the object and path.
const path = ['foo', 0, 'bar'] as const
nav({ foo: [ { bar: true } ] } as const, path) //=> true
nav({ foo: [ { bar: 'foobar' } ] } as const, path) //=> 'foobar'

// ✔️ Or explicitly type the object and path
type foobar = { foo: [{ bar: true }] };
type path = ['foo', 0, 'bar']
const foobar: foobar = await foobarAPI(...)
const path: path = ['foo', 0, 'bar']
nav(foobar, path) //=> true

// 🆗 Or use the built in generics (while acceptable is also extra verbose)
type foobar = { foo: [{ bar: true }] };
nav<foobar, ['foo', 0, 'bar']>(foobar, ['foo', 0, 'bar']) //=> true

// 🆗 It is OK to not assert the object, but it will be less narrow than possible
nav({ foo: 'bar' }, ['foo'] as const) //=> string

Idiosyncrasies

Q: Why do we have to as const?
A: Read more on const assertion in this TS 3.4 Release or in this StackOverflow answer. In short, the TS intepreter uses this to narrow types down from type string to something narrower such as foobar. It also automatically narrows objects/tuples. Since the path parameter is a tuple, we can't afford narrowing this type, otherwise it will blow up the inference engine.

Contributing

Any contributing is welcome.